Bayesian updating with likelihood ratios
Start from a base rate, then move it by how much more likely the evidence was under one hypothesis than the other.
- Time cost
- 15 min
- Output
- Prior odds, likelihood ratio, posterior odds.
- Steps
- 5
Use when
- New evidence arrives and you must revise a belief rather than replace it.
- A test, signal or indicator has a known or estimable error rate.
- People are treating a positive result as proof.
Do not use when
- There is no defensible base rate, which makes the posterior arbitrary.
- The evidence is not independent of what you already counted — you will double-count it.
Inputs required
- A prior, as odds
- How likely the evidence is if true, and if false
Procedure
- 01
State the prior as odds
Odds, not percentages. A 5% base rate is 1:19 against. Odds make the update a multiplication instead of an equation.
- 02
Compute the likelihood ratio
How likely is this evidence if the hypothesis is true, divided by how likely if false. A test with 90% sensitivity and 90% specificity gives 0.9 / 0.1 = 9.
- 03
Multiply
Posterior odds = prior odds × likelihood ratio. 1:19 × 9 becomes 9:19.
- 04
Convert back if you must
9:19 is about 32%. Convert only at the end — updating in percentages is where the arithmetic goes wrong.
- 05
Ask what would move it back
Name the evidence that would push the odds the other way, and by how much. If nothing would, you are not reasoning from evidence.
Characteristic failure mode
Worked example
A screening test is 99% sensitive and 95% specific for a condition present in 1 in 2,000 people. A result comes back positive.
- 01Prior odds: 1:1999.
- 02Likelihood ratio: 0.99 / 0.05 = 19.8.
- 03Posterior odds: 19.8 : 1999, about 1:101.
Result
Roughly a 1% chance the condition is present, after a positive result on a test that is 99% sensitive. The base rate did nearly all the work.
Where to go next